发布时间：
Jo Appleford博士是BMC旗下60多个期刊编辑们的头头，他的职位描述是“managing the Executive Editors”。他在英国苏塞克斯大学举行的一次出版会议上，做过一个有关论文投稿的讲座，下面整理了些觉得很有帮助的内容。 严格评估你的结果（Critically assess your results）一个有价值的工作应该具备这些特点之一：原创性的结果、方法或工具；对已发表数据的重新分析或解释；对众多前人研究的综合分析（Meta-analysis）；对某个主题的综述；阴性结果有时候也有价值。如果你的结果是这样的，可能不值得发表，或者很难发表：过时的研究；有缺陷的或伪造的数据；前人研究的简单重复。那么如何评估你的结果，或者说如何跟踪领域进展？1）数据库检索（如PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus），尝试不同的关键词组合。2）充分利用很多数据库的特色工具，如相关文献列表（引用此文章列表等）、基于相同关键词的相关文章列表等。3）很多出版商还有基于领域或主题的网页，将类似的文献汇总在一起。简单的说，就是要实时关注领域内已发表的研究。另外要评估你的研究适合于什么样的文章类型（Original research，Methods & Software，Hypotheses，Reviews等），你的观点和证据新到什么程度，你的结论是否有足够的支持，你是否提出一个新的发现或并没有多少数据支持的假说等。 选择合适的刊物，了解审稿过程（Choose the right journal, know the process）以往的研究发现，作者们往往注重这几点：期刊的声望；目标读者；期刊的显示度；同行评审的速度。因此在选择期刊时，要考虑下面一些相关问题。1）期刊的目标和定位（aims and scope）。这往往可以从期刊主页看到，很重要的一点是，要浏览期刊近期发表的文章的主题。2）期刊的排名、声望、检索收录情况。比如影响因子、编委会成员的水平、还有哪些同行在这期刊发表等。3）期刊显示度。比如看期刊的Google排名，开放获取程度。4）编辑部结构。期刊编辑一般可以分为两类，专职编辑（专职于出版业，已不再从事研究）和“业余时间”编辑（依然从事研究的科学家），这些编辑是审稿意见的最终决定者。5）同行评审流程。完成投稿后，编辑部将首先对稿件进行评估（initial assessment），往往由主编或领域编辑评估稿件是否适合期刊的定位及其学术价值。对于有些期刊尤其是投稿量很大的高水平刊物，投稿前咨询（presubmission enquiries）显得比较重要，要准备好包括主要研究结果（abstract & outline）和研究价值（significance）的咨询信。之后编辑部将选择审稿人，对于投稿者来说，要合理利用期刊允许推荐和屏蔽审稿人的政策。编辑部选择审稿人时，往往会考虑同时邀请评估数据质量（方法部分）和学术价值（结果和讨论）的审稿人。对于BMC系列期刊来说，被高拒稿率刊物拒绝的稿件也可能被转移至更专业的刊物，比如被Genome Biology拒稿或许可以在BMC Genomics发表。 如何写出好论文（How to write a good manuscript）写好论文脑子中必须要记着这些点：1）保证内容清晰和讨论的逻辑性；2）一定要简练：过于冗长的讨论会使得重点不突出；3）讨论要建立在证据的基础上，不要夸大你的结论；4）清晰简洁地说明研究目的和你关注的科学问题；5）将你的工作置于领域背景内：一定要引用关键的文献，并且在正确的地方引用它们；6）严格遵守期刊规定（Author guidelines）。题目（title）。好的题目有助于更好地吸引读者和引用率，因此题目要明确和简洁，要有广泛的吸引力（避免任何不必要的细节），避免太专业的词汇和缩写。其实编辑和审者也会关注题目是否能否正确反映了文章的内容。摘要（abstract）。摘要应该能包括：研究目的以及你关注的科学问题为何重要；关键的方法和材料；主要的结果和结论。要慎重选择关键词，好的关键词可以更好地吸引读者并增加检索和引用，避免使用具有多重意思的缩写。编辑部邀请审者时一般只发送摘要，所以不好的摘要将可能使编辑认为论文科学价值不大或者审者拒绝审稿。投稿信（cover letter）。要写好投稿信，应该要知道如下问题的答案。你关注的科学问题是什么？针对这些问题的重要发现是什么？支持结论的证据是什么？跟你所关注的科学问题相关的最近发表的三篇论文都讲了什么？你的研究结果对于所在的研究领域有什么意义？你的研究结果对于更广泛的群体（生物学家或大众）有什么意义？你的论文还提供了哪些新的发现？是否有需要告知编辑部的其他信息？其他需要关注的问题：投稿前要请同行阅读并提出建议；图和表格是否清晰恰当；论文返修时一定要认真对待审者意见；如果转投另一个期刊，一定要修改投稿信的抬头和内容。 申诉（Appeals）同行评审并非一个民主的过程，不同的审者也常有不同的审稿意见，加上编辑可以否决审者的意见，因此，对于一篇被拒稿的稿件，有时要抓住申诉的机会。申诉时需要注意几点：不要一收到拒信就进行申诉，要认真地思考如何进行表达；审稿意见是否严重错误；是否能有效地反驳拒稿意见；要有礼貌并心平气和。如果能够让编辑相信拒稿意见是错误的，如果审者的拒稿理由能被证明是错误的或有偏见的，再加上编辑部或许会请另外的审者对论文进行评估，这时候申诉或许会成功。申诉时，要清楚的表明你的态度和观点，尽可能的增加有用的新的数据信息；不要利用作者的地位或名望，不要使用威胁和侮辱性语言，不要使用有声望的同行的支持，申诉信不要重复投稿信的内容。
请仔细查看此杂志的投稿说明：Compliance with Ethical StandardsTo ensure objectivity and transparency in research and to ensure that accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed, authors should include information regarding sources of funding, potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial), informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved Authors should include the following statements (if applicable) in a separate section entitled “Compliance with Ethical Standards” before the References when submitting a paper:Disclosure of potential conflicts of interestResearch involving Human Participants and/or AnimalsInformed consentPlease note that standards could vary slightly per journal dependent on their peer review policies ( double blind peer review) as well as per journal subject Before submitting your article check the Instructions for Authors The corresponding author should be prepared to collect documentation of compliance with ethical standards and send if requested during peer review or after The Editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned The author will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned Disclosure of potential conflicts of interestAuthors must disclose all relationships or interests that could have direct or potential influence or impart bias on the Although an author may not feel there is any conflict, disclosure of relationships and interests provides a more complete and transparent process, leading to an accurate and objective assessment of the Awareness of a real or perceived conflicts of interest is a perspective to which the readers are This is not meant to imply that a financial relationship with an organization that sponsored the research or compensation received for consultancy work is Examples of potential conflicts of interests that are directly or indirectly related to the research may include but are not limited to the following:Research grants from funding agencies (please give the research funder and the grant number)Honoraria for speaking at symposiaFinancial support for attending symposiaFinancial support for educational programsEmployment or consultationSupport from a project sponsorPosition on advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationshipsMultiple affiliationsFinancial relationships, for example equity ownership or investment interestIntellectual property rights ( patents, copyrights and royalties from such rights)Holdings of spouse and/or children that may have financial interest in the workIn addition, interests that go beyond financial interests and compensation (non-financial interests) that may be important to readers should be These may include but are not limited to personal relationships or competing interests directly or indirectly tied to this research, or professional interests or personal beliefs that may influence your The corresponding author collects the conflict of interest disclosure forms from all In author collaborations where formal agreements for representation allow it, it is sufficient for the corresponding author to sign the disclosure form on behalf of all Examples of forms can be foundhere:The corresponding author will include a summary statement in the text of the manuscript in a separate section before the reference list, that reflects what is recorded in the potential conflict of interest disclosure form(s)See below examples of disclosures:Funding: This study was funded by X (grant number X)Conflict of Interest: Author A has received research grants from Company A Author B has received a speaker honorarium from Company X and owns stock in Company Y Author C is a member of committee ZIf no conflict exists, the authors should state:Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of Research involving human participants and/or animals1) Statement of human rightsWhen reporting studies that involve human participants, authors should include a statement that the studies have been approved by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that the independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the The following statements should be included in the text before the References section:Ethical approval: “All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical ”For retrospective studies, please add the following sentence:“For this type of study formal consent is not ”2) Statement on the welfare of animalsThe welfare of animals used for research must be When reporting experiments on animals, authors should indicate whether the international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals have been followed, and that the studies have been approved by a research ethics committee at the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted (where such a committee exists)For studies with animals, the following statement should be included in the text before the References section:Ethical approval: “All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were ”If applicable (where such a committee exists): “All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were ”If articles do not contain studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors, please select one of the following statements:“This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the ”“This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the ”“This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the ”Informed consentAll individuals have individual rights that are not to be Individual participants in studies have, for example, the right to decide what happens to the (identifiable) personal data gathered, to what they have said during a study or an interview, as well as to any photograph that was Hence it is important that all participants gave their informed consent in writing prior to inclusion in the Identifying details (names, dates of birth, identity numbers and other information) of the participants that were studied should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, and genetic profiles unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the participant (or parent or guardian if the participant is incapable) gave written informed consent for Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve in some cases, and informed consent should be obtained if there is any For example, masking the eye region in photographs of participants is inadequate protection of If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic profiles, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort scientific The following statement should be included:Informed consent: “Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the ”If identifying information about participants is available in the article, the following statement should be included:“Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this ”
不到一周就找到了审稿人,应该还第一次的那2个审稿人吧?
需要。 该期刊收录于SCIE中，18年文章量为133篇，以双月刊的形式出版。审稿周期较快，约1-3个月，自引率较低，为4%，版面费较低，每篇统一收取300美元。国人发文占比高达41%，接受率高达62%左右。接收论著的自由来稿，综述仅接受邀稿。特别提出的是GENES & GENOMICS为着急上线的作者提供快速通道，文章接收后，缴纳200美金费用，就可以加速优先出版。
Physiological Genomics网络释义Physiological Genomics: 生理基因组学physiological genomics and pathological genomics: 生理与病理基因组学期刊名 physiological genomics 出版周期： 半月刊偏重的研究方向：GWAS(1) 外显子组(1) 基因组(1) genomics(1) 审稿速度：平均2个月的审稿周期 投稿命中率：25%SCI期刊分区 大类：生物3区；小类：生理学 3区 中科院JCR分区 大类：生物 3区； 小类： 细胞生物学 4区、生理学 3区、遗传学 3区NLM 缩写： Physiol GenomicsNLM ID： 9815683出版国家： United States出版地： Bethesda, MD出版商： American Physiological Society出版周期： Once or twice a year创刊年份： 1999语言： 英语SCI收录： YES
需要。 该期刊收录于SCIE中，18年文章量为133篇，以双月刊的形式出版。审稿周期较快，约1-3个月，自引率较低，为4%，版面费较低，每篇统一收取300美元。国人发文占比高达41%，接受率高达62%左右。接收论著的自由来稿，综述仅接受邀稿。特别提出的是GENES & GENOMICS为着急上线的作者提供快速通道，文章接收后，缴纳200美金费用，就可以加速优先出版。
Microbial Genomics十一本不错的微生物方向的期刊，该刊创刊于2015年，由美国微生物协会 American Society for Microbiology创办，是其官方期刊，主要收录与微生物基因组学相关的文章。主编是澳大利亚墨尔本莫纳什大学的Kathryn Holt教授。 1）影响因子：Microbial Genomics拥有影响因子的时间并不长，2018年获得第一个影响因子853，表现非常亮眼，2019年则为632，以保持着5分+的水准。我们计算了现在的即时影响因子，108分，今年应该5分左右。Microbial Genomics拥有影响因子的时间并不长，2018年获得第一个影响因子853，表现非常亮眼，2019年则为632，以保持着5分+的水准。我们计算了现在的即时影响因子，108分，今年应该5分左右。 2）审稿周期：我们来看几篇今年发表的论文，平均3个月左右接受，当然有的快一些，有的相对慢一些。整体来说，接收速度不慢。 3）版面费：作为一本开放获取期刊，作者只能选择OA，版面费1500英镑，约合人民币13500元。Case Reports and Pedagogy articles免费。回答参考资料
BMC Genomics是SCI收录期刊，近三年影响因子：2009年：7592010年：2062011年：073
科技论文投稿是非常严谨的，首先我们需要把我们的作品尽量的写好，主要是逻辑清楚，没有标点符号这样的常识性错误。我们的论文才更有可能被编辑接受。
（1）选择合适的期刊选择合适的目标期刊是很关键的步骤首先，在写文章之前，作者应该根据自己的研究方向选定涵盖该学科领域的期刊，这样可以避免因为文章主题与目标期刊不相匹配而导致的拒稿。然后再根据目标期刊的投稿要求和需要的文章形式来确定写作方式，比如有些letter类型的期刊是有明显的篇幅限制，写作方式当然也就与一般全文型文章有差异。如果在投稿之前不注意这些问题，即使研究方向、学科领域都匹配，文章被直接拒稿的几率也会大大增加。（2）确保文章各部分符合期刊要求通常期刊对摘要部分会有具体的字数限制，投稿之前应该仔细阅读作者指南以确保符合期刊的要求。简介部分要写得简明扼要，若是写得太多则会弱化重点内容、让文章显得头重脚轻以及出现不恰当地评论前人工作的失误。摘要和结论需要仔细反复推敲以达到高质量水平，因为这两部分被阅读的几率最高。在其他方面如文章长度、字体大小、图表规格和参考文献格式等，也都应该仔细检查看是否都符合该期刊的投稿要求。（3）潜在的利益冲突科学研究是要本着客观的原则来进行，从而为科学界和广大读者提供最真实的结果。研究课题中涉及到的所有利益冲突，都有可能会影响科学成果的公正表达，因此必须予以披露和说明。现在科研活动中最常见的是经济利益冲突，比如为了获取企业或他人的资助而采用不当的模型或者方法作出有利于资助方的结论，从而损害了科学的真实性和客观性。因此，作者在投稿时有责任报告这些可能引起文章发生偏倚的利益冲突。（4）版权文章中如果直接使用了别人的材料，比如教科书或其他文章的图片，必须明确提及。一般来说，直接用原作者的原文或者原图时需要取得版权方（即出版社）的授权，当然最好也要与作者联系并得到他们的同意，这也是表示对作者劳动的尊重。除此以外，也可以根据原文进行转述或自己重新作图，最后再加上引用。（5）投稿信投稿信（Cover Letter）是向期刊投稿时附上的一封说明信，基本上所有的期刊在投稿时都需要这样一封给编辑的信件。它的作用不仅仅是形式化地问候编辑，而且能够让编辑快速地了解文章的创新点和重要性。投稿信里面应该包含这些信息：（1）强调文章内容符合期刊涵盖的学科领域；（2）点明文章的创新点和主要结果；（3）按需求添加建议的审稿人信息。投稿信是期刊编辑最先阅读的部分，它的质量直接影响着编辑对稿件的整体印象。因此投稿信应注意以下三点：（1）语言简明扼要；（2）对投稿期刊的评价中肯适当；（3）对自己的稿件有自信；（4）语气谦逊适度，态度诚恳，措辞得体。投稿前最好再进行一次语言校对以确保没有低级的语法和拼写错误；仔细检查数据和图形，以保证引用的图表即使经过反复修改仍能避免产生错误或混淆。最后，若是方便可以请师长同学帮助检查稿件，以便多角度发现问题。
你直接找杂志社没用的，找杂志社的采编单位，投稿邮箱，注明投稿杂志 和你的联系方式
其一，是如何进行投稿期刊的选择，合适对口的期刊选择，可以提高投稿的命中率，大大减少投稿周期；其二，如何根据投稿须知把文章的格式进行相应的调整，不少论文是因为格式审查不过关，要么直接被拒稿，要么进行一次次返修，在这个过程中耽误了不少时间，十分不值得。