发布时间：
不一定的，外审也需要不同的专家审阅，一般是3名专家，有两名以及以上专家同意才算通过
看你投的啥期刊才知道
原因有很多。一是文章本身的内容。多学科交叉研究日益增多，也给编辑寻找审稿人带来了难度。要确定哪些技术方面需要被覆盖，需要确保找到需要数量的审稿人来评断这些技术方面。二是作为顶刊审稿过程较为严格。由于审稿人的意见通常较为详细，整个审稿流程会较长。在整个审稿过程中诸多情况可能发生，比如审稿人中途无法跟进，编辑就需要考虑是否仍需要引入新审稿人，也比如审稿人意见争议较大，这种情况编辑也会考虑引出新审稿人对争议点进行评论以求向作者反馈更公平客观的建设性意见。三是编辑处理稿件量巨大，拿自然通讯来说，2016年全年收到超过三万篇投稿，最终发表超过四千篇。拿小编来说，每周单是新进系统的稿件就要处理20余篇，除此之外还有在不同阶段的稿件处理。另外编辑们除了审稿工作外，还需要做例如新闻稿撰写，会议，宣传等多方面工作，这也导致了从投稿到送审再到收到审稿意见会有些许时间差。
不一定的，外审也需要不同的专家审阅，一般是3名专家，有两名以及以上专家同意才算通过
会EI期刊的选择，EI期刊不算少，国内也有部分优秀的工程技术期刊被EI检索收录，有的作者倾向选择国内EI期刊。其实国内外期刊都是没有问题的，主要看期刊的专业和研究方向是否与论文相符，即便选择国内EI期刊，同样也是需要英文写作的，不要以为国内EI期刊就可以中文写作。ei中文期刊不好投。确切的说应该是ei中文期刊不好中，而不是不好投，对期刊投稿都是一样的，使用投稿系统，注册一个账号然后投稿，但是投稿录用就比较难。中文的ei期刊不是很多，并且大多数都是行内的优秀期刊或者很好的高校期刊，投稿量巨大，一般都会优中选优。
建议常跟编辑联系，以密切跟踪稿件状态。三个月了还没有意见，时间有点漫长了；而且按照现在的情况分析，还有的等呢。makunjida(站内联系TA)前面专家不审稿，换人了，也有可能意见不统一huashi59688(站内联系TA)电子学报的编辑们很不负责，我投了之后三个月都没送审，给那边打电话时答复说忘了送审了；之后两个月都没有审稿结果，之后打电话那边才答复说已经有结果了，稿件被拒了。建议你打电话催一下，说不定早就有结果了，只是不告诉你而已！Kingso(站内联系TA)我的审了八个月，中间也加过一个审稿人，可能是觉得前面的审稿意见太简单吧（只有一句话）。还好后来意见挺好的。接收了。Kingso(站内联系TA)我的审了八个月，中间也加过一个审稿人，可能是觉得前面的审稿意见太简单吧（只有一句话）。还好后来意见挺好的。接收了。barney2010(站内联系TA)至今还是两个空意见呀前面_youwo(站内联系TA)最近想投一篇文章，赶时间是不是投电子学报不好啊
有时候审稿意见没有发给作者，有可能是外审专家拒审
我的也是，第一次4个外审，后来又增加了3个
王应宽Wang Yingkuan2011-07-23Beijing, China因为同时在运作3本国际英文刊（IJABE, IAEJ, CIGR Journal），论文同行评审的专家来自世界各地。每次收到的评审意见千差万别，而且不同国家或地区的专家的评审意见呈现一定的规律性，随即不由得做些比较。比较得出的基本结论是：欧美国家专家的评审意见详尽具有更大参考价值，台湾地区的同行评审专家次之，大陆专家的评审意见最为简省。文后附上几篇评审意见（所列大陆专家评审意见还是相对较好的），看看便知，一目了然。我曾与编辑同行讨论关于国内专家审稿的问题。共同的见解是，一线一流的专家基本不审稿。若应邀审稿，要么直接拒审，要么敷衍几句了事；比较认真的专家大都让其所指导的研究生代为评审论文。不论让谁审，最后的评审意见与国外专家的评审相比总不令人满意，存在较大的差距。国外专家评审论文大都是义务劳动，没有任何报酬。但专家们认为自己作为科研人员是科学共同体中的一分子，有义务担任同行专家为他人研究成果的学术质量把关。自己为别人的论文评审把关付出了智慧和劳动，别人也会为自己的研究和论文评审把关，也会付出相应的劳动。专家之间相互协作，相互帮助，虽然没有评审报酬，但大家都觉得平等。而且，国外的专家大都言行一致，故能认真地做好每一篇文章的评审工作。有的评审意见详尽的令人赞叹、钦佩和感动。因此，大家看到他们的评审意见都非常详尽而具有参考价值。而国内的专家评审论文为何大都仓促应付，三言两语，或言之无物，或毫无参考价值？主要原因是一线一流的专家都太“忙”，以至忙得都没时间做学术了。据我从事学术期刊工作十多年的经历，不论评审中文文章还是英文文章，国内专家评审意见普遍简单，评审的质量不高，不但看不出有改观的迹象，还有进一步恶化的趋势。文章中存在的很多的问题，专家审后没有看出来或没有指出来。如果直接发表，错误或疏漏太多影响论文的质量和期刊的声誉。在外审专家靠不住时，就要依靠内审做些完善和提高。如果外审专家把不好关，编辑部又无能力通过内审把关，发表出来的论文的质量也就可想而知了。是否国内专家不擅长评审论文呢？非也。据了解，许多国内专家被国外知名期刊邀请审稿时，他们非常积极认真地评审论文，并在规定时间返回颇有水准的评审意见。据说他们也能做得与欧美国际同行专家一样好。可见，国内专家评不好国内期刊论文不是水平问题，而是态度问题，“时间”问题，或者有其他方面的原因。同行评审是学术期刊论文质量把关的重要途径。如果大家都不在乎，把严肃认真的“盲审”变成“瞎审”，学术危矣！国内期刊请国内专家评审论文大都支付审稿费的。当然，限于各期刊的经济困难，审稿费报酬普遍都不高。因此，同行专家大都不很在乎那点可怜的审稿费。如果评审不好文章会影响专家的声誉和公信度。国内特别是大陆的专家既不在乎钱，也不在乎自己的声誉，不知道他们究竟在乎啥？中国是雷锋诞生的国度，按理说，当志愿者做公益应该很有基础。但在学术圈，就拿国内外同行专家无私奉献评审论文作比较，中国的同行专家做的还很不够，需要好好向国际同行学习。附：CIGR Journal栏目主编加拿大专家对一篇退稿文章的评审意见June 27, 2011Dear P H L L:Re: CIGR Manuscript 1911 EFFECTS OF TRACTOR INFLATION PRESSURE AND TRAFFIC ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIESAs CIGR section editor, I have conducted a preliminary review of the above The manuscript addresses a significant engineering problem in agricultural crop production, and as such, the subject matter is of interest to CIGRHowever, the manuscript is deficient in several scientific The decision is to decline the manuscript without peer My preliminary review is attached to the end of this Please note that the preliminary review is by no means a comprehensive The manuscript is released, and you are free to submit it for publication in another Thank you for considering CIGR for publication of your work and I wish you success in getting your work SincerelyPE, PD,CIGR Section III editor,Research Scientist, Agricultural Engineering,Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,Section Editor ReviewTitle: EFFECTS OF TRACTOR INFLATION PRESSURE AND TRAFFIC ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIESCIGR # 1911Authors:H L L et June 27, 2011General:The manuscript addresses soil compaction by multiple passes with agricultural machinery which is a timely topic and of importance to sustainable agricultural There are numerous grammatical errors although the meaning is generally It is strongly recommended that the authors seek the assistance of someone well versed in English to help with the The manuscript is not acceptable in its present It needs a lot of The biggest problem with the manuscript is that key pieces of information are not given, and that the data analysis is not Some of the major deficiencies are listed below although this is by no means an exhaustive Soil It is well known that soil characteristics have a huge influence on soil The only description given is that the soil was a sandy Things like soil series, percent sand, silt and clay, soil organic matter all influence compaction and need to be Tractor specifications: Total tractor weight, tractor axle (or wheel) weights, are critical pieces of information required for compaction studies, but they are not Tire pressure was given, but no information was given on whether these pressures were the same for front and rear Often, tractor manufacturers recommend different pressures for front and rear tires, particularly on tractors with different sizes of front and rear Slip was measured, but there was no mention made of whether the tractor was free wheeling (no implement draft) or whether it was pulling a The drawbar load on a tractor has a huge effect on wheel slip, and must be It was mentioned that a 4WD tractor was used, and different tire sizes were given for front and rear tires which implies that it was a front wheel It needs to be specified whether or not the front wheel drive was Results: A randomized complete block statistical design with three replicates was However, the results are given in a series of tables with simple means with no statistical The results need to be subjected to appropriate statistical analysis, ANOVA or multiple regression analysis, and appropriate post hoc tests applied to determine which means are statistically different from each The experimental design employed lends itself to standard statistical analysis of the Graphs should be used when appropriate to help illustrate the data and the Table 1, 2 and 3 and Cone index has wrong Cone index is normally given in MPa or kPAlso, the values for cone index are much lower than normally Section 3It is not necessary to list all of the equipment used such as oven, air compressor, All you need to say is that samples were oven dried at 105�0�2 C for soil moisture Things like air compressor and pressure gauge are every day shop equipment, are understood to be necessary for any type of experiment where inflation pressures are However, things like the penetrometer, and shear vane meter should be These are specialized pieces of equipment and their performance can affect the Section Need to provide information on which soil cone penetrometer you Also, how many penetrometer measurements per plot per pass?3)In Figure 4, the text “USB Connection” was overlapped by the 4)In Figure 4, the line with the “Information Collection” is missing an 5)In Figure 7, the text “field identifying number” was covered by the 6)In Figure 8, some texts are placed out of the 7)Please use consistent fonts in figures throughout the Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division Editor/Editor-in-chiefI recommend the authors should use consistent fonts throughout the The paper cannot be accepted in its present 中国大陆专家1评审论文意见Section III: CommentsThis section is the most valuable part of the review for the author(s), who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand your review, and possibly prepare a Use all the space you General Comments:This paper assess the O2 consumption rate and the CO2 evolution rate in tomato pomace treated with Pleurotus ostreatus without and with Mn to determine if peak colonization rate (for heightened delignification) was delayed by Generally speaking, the author’s work is useful and The author gives a brief introduction to the related work and compares his ideas to The theoretical analysis of this article is In all, this manuscript has good novelty and strong technical strength, I’m looking forward the results of further investigations on this Specific comments:In Table 1, notes are not enough in this In the Results and Discussion, results have been detailed explained, but some theoretical analysis of the experimental data are not Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division EditorI hope the paper will be published to guide more Reviewers’ information (Blind to Authors)中国大陆专家2评审论文意见(相对而言属于国内专家评审较为认真仔细的了)Section III: CommentsThis section is the most valuable part of the review for the author(s), who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand your review, and possibly prepare a Use all the space you General Comments:Variable Spray will play an important role in saving resources, protecting environment, raising quality of agricultural The purpose of this paper is to evaluate PWM-based continuous variable spray in terms of spray distribution pattern, spray droplet size, and spray angle for flat-fan, hollow-cone and solid-cone The test design, results, analysis and conclusion are After re-review, this paper may be published, I Specific comments:(1)I have read a paper named “Variable rate Continuous Spray Equipment Based on PWM Technology and Its Spray Characteristics”, which was published in Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2008, 39 (6): 77-80 (in Chinese)”(see the attachment), I think that is a previous study work of the If that is correct, I suggest the author adding that paper in the references of this And then, the contents which have been described in the previous paper can be deleted from this (2)In the abstract “The sensitivities of the spray angles to flow-rate are 8254o/%、6681o/%、5761o/% respectively for flat-fan, the hollow-cone and the solid-cone nozzles” In English, without the symbol “、”(3)The numerical data in the conclusion are not the same as those in the abstract”Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division EditorReviewers’ information (Blind to Authors)中国大陆专家3评审论文意见Section III: CommentsThis section is the most valuable part of the review for the author(s), who are extremely interested in how you formed your opinion of this Please provide specific comments that will help the author(s) understand your review, and possibly prepare a Use all the space you General Comments:This paper is more important, but it still needs major revision requiring re-Specific comments:Revision suggestions of this paper: The study results and conclusions should be clarified in It should be described clearly about the data and size of NACA0015 airfoil which was selected in the numerical simulation in section It should be described clearly about the specific quantitative conditions of icing in section This paper is required re-review after Confidential Comments to Associate Editor/Division Editor
外审专家通常有3-4位不等，这些专家都是本专业内的学者或教授，外审专家精通本专业领域内的相关研究，所以对文章中涉及专业的内容可以做出精准判断，这一点是杂志社编辑无法达到的，所以外审需要由这些专家来完成，专家有期刊指定的，也有需要作者自己进行推荐的。
论文外审的意思主要如下：1、高校毕业生毕业论文的审核以不记名的形式送往其他高校，由相关人员进行审核。2、研究生以上学历学生毕业设计或论文完成后，需送到其他高校或研究所的科技人员处审核，相关人员审核后提出相应修改意见，学生修改完成后才可参加毕业答辩。论文：常用来指进行各个学术领域的研究与描述学术研究成果的文章。它既是探讨问题进行学术研究的一种手段，又是描述学术研究成果进行学术交流的一种工具。主要包括学年论文、毕业论文、学位论文、科技论文、成果论文等。
会不通过。论文缺少新意：论文外审环节当中会对论文的原创性进行审查。实验论点复制别人已发表的文献，或经过简单推理就能从已知的论文文献中推理得到的，或复制他人成果的论文常被拒稿。分析不到位：在外审环节中论文虽有新的发现，但是没有提炼升华并上升到理论的高度。只有单纯的定性描述，缺乏定量的、理论的分析也常常会被拒稿。只要盲审2个专家通过，或者外审的2个专家通过就取得答辩权利，答辩委员会不包括外审专家，要半数通过就能够毕业。