原子能科学技术投稿经验介绍英文作文

blackiron.sh

1小时前发布

Why We Should Use Nuclear EnergyThe growth of nuclear energy in the United States suffered a double whammy in 1979 with the almost simultaneous occurrence of the Three Mile Island accident and the release of the movie The China SThe Three Mile Island accident, which is most significant accident in the nuclear power industry in the United States, in retrospect was a very minor incident that resulted in zero deaths or However, it was used by anti nuclear activists to basically kill off any new nuclear plants in this Jane Fonda, the star of The China Syndrome, used the incident to campaign against nuclear power and promote her Most of the opposition to nuclear power comes from irrational fear, a fear that is fed by those opposed to nuclear Many people who formerly were opposed to nuclear power are now strong supporters of Among these people are:Patrick Moore, a co founder of GreenPeace, who stated in a September 2006 appearance before the US House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development:In the early 1970s, I believed that nuclear energy was synonymous with nuclear holocaust, as did most of my Greenpeace That’s the conviction that inspired Greenpeace’s first voyage across the North Pacific coast to protest the testing of US hydrogen bombs in Alaska’s Aleutian IBut a lot has changed in the 35 years since then, and my views have changed along with these new As a co-chair of the Clean and Safe Energy Coalition along with G Christy Todd Whitman, I make it known often that I strongly believe the rest of the environmental movement needs to update its views, too, because now—more than ever before—nuclear energy is the Electricity source that can save our planet from another possible disaster: potentially harmful climate James Lovelock, known for proposing the Gaia hypothesis, in which he postulates that the Earth functions as a kind of Lovelock states:“The important and overriding consideration is time; we have nuclear power now, and new nuclear building should be started All of the alternatives, including fusion energy, require decades of development before they can be employed on a scale that would significantly reduce In the next few years, renewables will add an increment of emission-free energy, mainly from wind, but it is quite small when compared with the nuclear ”Stewart Brand, founder, publisher, and editor of The Whole Earth C Brand states:“Now we come to the most profound environmental problem of all … global climate Its effect on natural systems and on civilization will be a universal permanent … So everything must be done to increase energy efficiency and decarbonize energy Kyoto accords, radical conservation in energy transmission and use, wind energy, solar energy, passive solar, hydroelectric energy, biomass, the whole But add them all up and it’s still only a fraction of … The only technology ready to fill the gap and stop the carbon dioxide loading of the atmosphere is nuclear … It also has advantages besides the overwhelming one of being atmospherically The industry is mature, with a half-century of experience and ever improved Engineering behind … Nuclear power plants are very high yield, with low-cost Finally, they offer the best avenue to a ‘hydrogen economy,’ combining high energy and high heat in one place for optimal hydrogen ”Much is always made about the issue of nuclear waste and what to do with The United States only generates about 20% of its electricity from Here is a sample of the percentage of electricity generated by nuclear power in other countries:Country PercentFrance 8Lithuania 4Slovakia 3Belgium 0Ukraine 1Sweden 1Armenia 5Slovenia 6Switzerland 0So why don't these countries have a problem of nuclear waste storage larger than the US? It is because they recycle their nuclear Something that was banned in the US during the Carter A The ban has since been lifted, but US policy still opposes About 95% of nuclear waste can be recycled and Using recycling, France estimates that all the nuclear waste generated to provide electricity for a family of four, for 20 years, can be stored harmlessly in a glass cylinder the size of a cigarette Here are some more facts about nuclear energy from the Clean and Safe Energy Coalition:Nuclear energy is:CleanNuclear energy is an environmentally clean option to produce electricity choice – it produces no harmful greenhouse gases suspected to cause global warming and no gases that could cause ground-level ozone formation, smog or acid Nuclear already accounts for 73 percent of the nation’s emission-free electricity generation and needs be used in compliment with other Alternative renewable energy sources are important, but can only take us so far – wind and solar can be unreliable and geothermal power isn’t well-suited for all The other major sources of emission-free electricity are hydroelectric plants, which provide 6 percent of our nation’s electricity; wind energy, 4 percent; and solar energy, 01 Safe and SecureNuclear energy is a safe For example, you would have to live near a nuclear power plant for more than 2,000 years to get the same amount of radiation exposure that you receive from a single diagnostic medical x-Nuclear energy is A two-day national security simulation in Washington, DC, in 2002 conducted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) concluded nuclear plants “are probably our best defended targets,” with the industry spending $2 billion in security since September 11, Affordable and Reliable With rising energy costs a concern for every American, nuclear energy is an affordable and reliable economic choice for Nuclear power has the lowest production cost of the major sources of Nuclear plants are the most efficient on the electricity grid and their costs are more predictable than many other energy Economically BeneficialNuclear energy brings economic From new jobs around new plants to adding $500 million a year to the economy for each new plant brought on line, nuclear plants bring significant economic Additionally, employees at the plant earn an average of 36 percent more than average earnings in the surrounding communities, so the jobs are high- Perhaps that is why an opinion survey, conducted by Bisconti Research I, found that 76 percent of Americans living in close proximity to nuclear power plants are willing to see a new reactor built near Nuclear power is a technology that exists Nuclear energy can fulfill all of our electrical needs now and into the The fuel is readily available in the United S It is safe and It is It is very In short there is no good reason not to use nuclear power

杰爱小吃

9小时前发布

《陕西农业科学》投稿须知　　《陕西农业科学》属综合性农业科技期刊，主要报道农、林、水、土等方面的试验研究、新技术的推广与应用、新品种的介绍与推广、研究综述和农村经济发展问题等。主要栏目：农业试验研究、农艺探讨、经济论坛、新农村建设、农业实用技术等。　　《陕西农业科学》承蒙大家的关心和支持，2008年再次被国家科技部评为：中国科技核心期刊。敬请广大读者和作者继续关注和支持《陕西农业科学》的发展。　　稿件格式要求按文题、作者姓名、工作单位、邮编、提要、关键词、正文、作者简介、参考文献（精确到页码）顺序编排，。而且，必须在文章首页或末页附作者电话和详细通讯地址。　　文章要求电子稿件，文字和格式规范，字迹清楚，采用国家规定的统一计量单位与符号。文中图、表力求少而精。每篇文章不超过5000字。“提要”在200字以内，“关键词”为3～5个，附英文篇名、作者简介和研究项目来源。　　网上投稿必须以附件的形式发送。也可以直接通过QQ投稿。请勿一稿两投，文章经三审通过后，编辑部会及时与作者联系。刊用后酌付稿酬。